Two authors, two minds, twice the amount of visualizations. For me, there was almost to much. A lot of people said that they were reading it as a book or watching a movie. But, it seemed to long. I'm not saying it wasn't nice for them to make it easy to visualize the movie, but to a certain extent, it just lagged on. However, by loading the screenplay up like they did, they were able to get across their point so that the director would be less likely to change anything when they presented it so well. Compared to Goldman, they were more descriptive, but, when reading Goldmans screenplays, his flowed much better, even without extreme detailed visualization and camera movements.
DQ
1. Two established writers, battling for supremacy, OR, they each create thier own characters, and show the interactioin between them?
2. In writing the same script, whose would do better, Goldman or Wallace/Kelly
No comments:
Post a Comment